Saturday, September 21, 2013

Southern Collector Road, What's the REAL Reason?

No doubt, development comes, but at what cost?  The property to build this road was taken through eminent domain from Sam and Uta Brown, owners of Crooked Run Orchard. The farm had been in their family since the original land grant from Lord Fairfax. I would say that's a long time. Eminent domain is a means for obtaining property for use of highways and public facilities, but not for developers or private use, or to bring jobs to the area.

Taking of the Brown's property at Crooked Run Orchard by the Town of Purcellville to create the Southern Collector Road (SCR) was to alleviate the back ups on Main Street and prevent drivers from using Maple Avenue, south of town, as a commuting byway. Numerous signs dotted lawns along this avenue and other connecting roadways throughout the south side of town with, "Build the SCR now" and "I don't travel through your neighborhood, don't travel through mine." Although these streets are all public, some residents felt the need to express that they were somewhat private.

The town believed that by building this road that it would reduce traffic on those two arteries that deliver drivers to their homes south and west of town. West end of town? On any given day a glance and the windshield of the vehicles will tell you if they are town residents or not. There is a larger percentage of out-of-town residents traveling Main Street than residents. With the recently placed double turn lane at the off ramp of the Rt. 287 and Rt. 7 bypass, it was obvious that drivers were using Hirst Road as a main commuting roadway for those traveling to western destinations.

The real reason for the SCR will be to support the traffic for future developments located along the SCR and Rt. 690. As you will soon see, a new shopping center, Catoctin Corner, will appear south of Patrick Henry College in the northeast corner of the here-today-gone-tomorrow-and-back-again traffic circle. In the meantime, Rt. 287's new alignment tries to direct the traffic coming into town to the Purcellville Gateway Shopping Center, then to the SCR. Seems an avoidance of other retailers located on Main Street and 21st Street, which in the last few years brought vibrancy to the downtown area. If you are new to the area or just visiting, or weren't paying attention, the roadway leads right into their "friend's" new development.

What would have happened had a traffic circle and the SCR not opened. These two videos may give you an idea of what has changed since opening this road in July. A steady stream of vehicles coming through town off of Rt. 287 make a right hand merge into the circle and continue west on Main Street on a Tuesday at 5:20 p.m.



I know the SCR may be new to some, but it has been open since the beginning of the summer. As a resident and taxpayer, I can't justify the Town's expenses involved in this project. This video taken at 5:30 pm. on Tuesday, September 18, shows only fifteen drivers using it, in what would be the heaviest traffic flow hour.


Some simple math. The studies conducted prior to the project estimated it would alleviate 13,000 trips from the main artery (Main St.). As you have seen in the video above, those 15 cars help achieve almost half of their goal per day. But at what cost? The cost of the quarter-mile project was over $6 million. 13,000 trips divided by 365 days equals on average 35.6 cars per day. Now spread that cost of the project over 5 years and the cost per car is over $100 per trip. Quite expensive quarter mile, wouldn't you say?

So what was the real reason for the Southern Collector Road? We may never know what goes on behind closed doors, secret meetings and under-the-table deals to someone else's benefit. But I guarantee there is more development coming along this roadway. Taking 35 cars off can't nearly justify the expense to taxpayers, the loss of revenue and property for the owners, and the ongoing fight for 20 years. I guess to quote a local supporter of the road that "This land is God’s land and the farmer was just trying to keep it for himself." Those darn farmers.

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Trust in Government

That's what you're lead to believe. But when the "people" that are assigned to a decision making position, the power goes to their head. Look at these recent scandals regarding IRS, Benghazi, and FoxNews. And you thought after the Fast and Furious controversy it would get brushed under the rug? If you lie, you have to lie in all instances. Most of these people involved in scandals established their power in their community through committees and small town elected position. It just doesn't start at the White House.

Take a look at Washington, DC. Mayor Marion Barry was reelected even though he engaged in unsavory activities while in public office. The public in general feels there is comfort in the "known," and feel it's the devil you don't know that they have to worry about. You know... like it the movie the Distinguished Gentleman, it's the name you know. Barry too built his resume even though he had these scandals revealed.

So goes small town politics. Building a resume is important to even small town elected officials. They will do what needs to be done to add more ink to paper and reflect a diverse background so it enables a bigger hand up to a bigger step in larger government. Traveling to other countries sharing ideas on health, climate, transportation, and energy, all the while billing you the taxpayer for it.

Currently the Town of Purcellville is attempting to garner additional funding for the reconstruction of 21st Street in Historic Downtown. According to the grant application to the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB), there was overwhelming support for the project by businesses. Could this be adding ink to the paper?

Upon looking closely at the application, the majority of the businesses listed the same location, which was the Purcellville Community Farmers Market on 21st Street. These vendors do no have a business license, nor do they live in Purcellville. Otherwise known as "no dog in the fight." Of course, there was support by Blue Ridge District Supervisor, Janet Clarke, (resident) and Loudoun County Board of Supervisors Chairman, Scott York - those other faux Republicans. But it doesn't end there. John Chapman (business owner and property owner) penned several letters under his various company names. Each of the letters counted as support for the project. There are additional letters of support from a business owner, who is also a resident, and various form letters from 2011 that were resubmitted in this funding round.

What the Town doesn't tell you is that there is a great deal of residents that do not want to see Phase 2 of this project completed. So the "town's" (using town to denote elected officials, employees and those secretly in tight with the administration) M.O. is to communicate with the CTB to try to portray residents as unhappy and just one step away from looney. Bottom line, taxpayers were lied to about the fiscal responsibility and the purpose of this project. This project is clearly to prep this area so that the downtown area will be more attractive to an investor for that 5-story hotel planned for the corner of O Street and 21st.

To burden the residents with additional taxes, especially after just getting a big whopper of an increase between water rates and Fireman's Field Tax District, is criminal. If the Town would promote important committee meetings and input sessions with as much zeal as they do for other community events on the famous flashing board, more people would attend meetings to express their concerns. Wait! That's right, they don't want YOUR input.

So to navigate against deceit, I have taken the time to write to the Mr. Gary Garcynski of the Commonwealth Transportation Board and ask that they do not approve this project. I cited all of the inconsistencies and falsehoods stated by our public officials. This nearly $3 million is wasted taxpayers dollars. There were too many untruths in the grant application and in public Infrastructure meetings, only to make the approval of this project an endorsement of fraud. If you care about how much money you're giving to your debted town, write to Mr. Garcynski before the Commonwealth Transportation Board approval meeting in June and let him know. This money surely could be used for the infrastructure of Moore, OK. If you need more information on this project or would like to contact me, please use the link at the right.

Trust only resides in God. I trust that God is watching.


Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Purcellville Urban Growth Area Management Plan (PUGAMP)


A LETTER FROM RESIDENT KELLI GRIM
*************************************************

Dear Loudoun County Supervisors and concerned neighbors,
 
I personally obtained this information in the link below regarding Boundary Line Adjustments (Annexations). The letter I have included below from the Commission on Local Government confirmed that this is the process provided by the Commonwealth of VA state code. I spoke to Susan to verify the details after reading the Boundary Line Adjustment document many times.  he second link will show you just how many acres the Town of Purcellville has annexed since 2008 too. 
 
The Loudoun County Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2012-002 states, “In 2012, recognizing that the Town did not desire any increased density and growth outside the current incorporated town boundaries into the JLMA [Joint Land Management Area overseen by the town and the county], the Purcellville Joint Policies Review Committee and the Town of Purcellville called for the repeal of the PUGAMP” [Purcellville Urban Growth Area Management Plan].
 
IF and only IF the town of Purcellville was sincere about not growing outside their existing boundaries, then there would be no reason to get rid of PUGAMP and the annexation agreement. I have asked for a direct and honest reason from Bob Lazaro and Janet Clarke just what are the benefits for eliminating the PUGUMP, they have said nothing. The silence is deafening and downright shameful. 
 
Janet Clarke's recent newsflash does not give any explanation how this decision is good for Loudoun county residents. What are the consequences? Any benefits?  Clarke and Lazaro simply want all the restrictions, checks and balances removed, and as little public input as possible. 
 
Did you know that Purcellville has been meeting in closed sessions even before the August 2012 Town Council vote to repeal PUGAMP. Their discussions have been about a possible annexation(see factual article here: http://brleader.com/?p=10575#more-10575)  This is only one of many that I know about.  ...Why?  They said they did not want any increased density or growth outside it's current boundaries. 
 
Any landowner inside or outside the town boundary that is concerned about the real agenda of the town and county politicians should make the effort to attend just a couple of meetings, and especially this Wednesday, Feb. 13 public hearing on this matter. I found a number of details stated in the recent newsflash sent by Ms. Clarke (note that this communication was not sent out to the entire Blue Ridge district, only to a small group in her district.) Ms. Clarke should get her facts straight because Middleburg does not have a JLMA and never did.  (feel free to call the Town Manager of Middleburg) The misinformation is coming from the politicians, while the residents with deep concerns about the inconsistency's and the lack of details as to the consequences of keeping or eliminating the JLMA go unanswered.

Please read the BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT document very carefully, understand that if the town and the county agree to allow any property brought into the town boundaries, which can include any parcel whether it is vacant or developed.  See page 2 under Court Proceedings..."There are no provisions for intervention by other parties". So, after 1 pubic hearing in the town, and 1 public hearing in the county, the municipalities (not the property owners) go the the circuit court and that is where it is finalized. Let me be very clear, there are developers/landowners right now just waiting for PUGAMP to end, they have plans and Bob and Janet know about those plans!
 
There are many times in the past 5 years that the Loudoun County planning dept. has pointed out the blatant violations by Purcellville of the PUGAMP. This slow growth contract is in Bob Lazaro and Janet Clarke's way, and no one in the gang of 4 even suggested a review or update. Just get rid of it! 
 
Because I cannot possible provide all the facts and information I have obtained over just the past year in one email. Let's simplify it: Below is the new ComprehensIve Plan Amendment explaining the facts as stated by Purcellville, that they do not have intentions of growing outside their existing town boundaries. Read it, seems pretty simple? Then simply leave PUGAMP in place, right? Or at least put in place a plan that would protect existing subdivisions from annexations, or even a memorandum of understanding.
 
Or better yet, act like grown ups and REVISE IT AND UPDATE IT as this 50 year agreement required to be done every 5 years. Get politics out of the way, tell the truth, and allow the residents to have their say in multiple public meetings.  hat's how we got PUGAMP. It was the hard work and thousands of volunteer participants that put it together. Yes, after 10 years, it needs updated, but it is the people's choice. (don't forget that it was Bob Lazaro and Janet Clarke while on Purcellville Town Council that sued the county "to protect PUGAMP"!  That political game cost Loudoun County residents over a million dollars in attorney fees, and nearly $6 million dollars in settlement money).
 
Read what it says...it is simple. If PUGAMP is to be repealed, then let Janet Clarke and Bob Lazaro put a promise in writing that this action will be upheld, no new annexations or boundary line adjustments without a vote!  Not a vote by the politicians, but a vote by the people! 

The Loudoun County Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2012-002 states, "In 2012, recognizing that the Town did not desire any increased density and growth outside the current incorporated town boundaries into the JLMA, the Purcellville Joint Policies Review Committee and the Town of Purcellville called for the repeal of the PUGAMP." (Purcellville Urban Growth Area Management Plan). 

Feel free to contact me by email or phone anytime. 

Kelli Grim
540-338-1976
 
http://brleader.com/?p=1639#more-1639 (The real financial status of Purcellville)

LETTER BELOW RECEIVED AUGUST 2012 FROM THE COMMONWEALTH'S POLICY MANAGER ATTORNEY
Ms. Grim:
Thank you for calling the Commission on Local Government. As promised, I am sending a link to our technical assistance document pertaining to Boundary Line Adjustments by Agreement (BLAs): http://www.dhcd.virginia.gov/CommissiononLocalGovernment/PDFs/Ch%2031%20Boundary%20Line.pdf.
In addition, here is a link to a document that we maintain that will depict for you how often BLAs have been used in Virginia since 1990: http://www.dhcd.virginia.gov/images/clg/Municipal-Boundary-Change-Actions-since-1990bydate.pdf. The “comments” column on the far right of the document will indicate for you which of these were the result of a “boundary line adjustment [by agreement].”
Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information.
Susan
Susan B. Williams, Esq.
Local Government Policy Manager
Commission on Local Government
Department of Housing and Community Development
Main Street Centre - 600 East Main Street, Suite 300
Richmond, VA 23219